Online Now 548

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

On this Board 140
Record: 2758 (12/1/2012)

Online now 550
Record: 11761 (2/27/2012)

Boards ▾

Inside Scoop

The Web's No. 1 forum for coverage and discussion of Terps sports

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

Off-Topic

Test/Feedback Forum

Feedback for IMS and 247Sports

The Ticket Exchange

Reply

Official Ravens Off-Season Thread (Rice Signed)

  • bkmalik said...

    I disagree simply because the Ravens were pretty bad at converting short yardage situations and Vince Wilfork was single-handedly obliterating the interior OL. If the Ravens go for it there I'd have bet $100 they didn't get the first down.

    co-signed. get points.

    7erps

  • 7erps said...

    co-signed. get points.

    It even goes beyond just getting points. I think you have to know your team and your personnel, your opponent, and how the game is being played at that time. The Ravens, especially the last half of the season, struggled quite a bit at converting short yardage situations. Hell, just look a week before at the Houston game for some anecdotal evidence. The Ravens couldn't get a yard or less on several plays in the second half, when converting any single one would have ended the game.

    At the time of the decision, early in the 2nd quarter, it was a 3-0 game and the Ravens had already stopped New England a couple of times. Plus Brady didn't look "on" having missed on some throws already. At that point it was pretty clear that New England wasn't going to put up 30-40 points like they had been. The Ravens defense showed they were good enough to keep the game close. So the game wasn't likely to be a shootout and the need to go for it was lessened.

    And really, you can keep going back to it but none of this really matters if Lee Evans holds on to a pass that 90% of the time is caught.

    bkmalik

  • I'm on board w/the Caldwell hiring, if it goes through. I'll be interested to see how the relationship between him and CC goes, since that's been an issue before (at least w/Zorn).

    And obviously, working w/PM for a decade is a huge plus, but then I also wonder how big a role he played in that, i.e. was it mostly him, or PM himself, or Tom Moore, or some combo of the three.

    At any rate, I just hope he comes in and helps to bring out the best in Joe.

    MITerp

  • FTR, I was furious when we didn't go for it. I think I was actually more furious that hardly anyone I was watching with agreed with me than with the actual decision, but yeah, should've gone for it.

    aschaefe

  • This thread really went somewhere I didn't expect.

    We are just like the Philadelphia Eagles of the early 2000's. Very good, not good enough. I don't know how anyone can say John Harbaugh has been more successful than Brian Billick at this point. The goal is to win a Super Bowl. You don't get trophies for trips to the AFC championship game. When Harbaugh wins a Super Bowl, you can then have this debate. Harbaugh is closer to being infamous for his team's playoff chokes than famous for his team's playoff success.

    charmcity3131

  • charmcity3131 said...

    This thread really went somewhere I didn't expect.

    We are just like the Philadelphia Eagles of the early 2000's. Very good, not good enough. I don't know how anyone can say John Harbaugh has been more successful than Brian Billick at this point. The goal is to win a Super Bowl. You don't get trophies for trips to the AFC championship game. When Harbaugh wins a Super Bowl, you can then have this debate. Harbaugh is closer to being infamous for his team's playoff chokes than famous for his team's playoff success.

    Well, I think this confirms the argument in Harbaugh's favor.

    bkmalik

  • Russell Jones said...

    Holy shit. No one is saying they would prefer going to the playoffs every year and never winning it all to actually winning a Super Bowl. What were saying is that its a false choice. Its not that difficult

    IT all stemmed from a comment that Billicks Superbowl was not important when evaluating who was a better coach because Harbaugh makes the playoffs every year and billick was sporadic. So it was a hypothetical question based off of that.

    Pic Sigs are for losers.

    jgdomino

  • aschaefe said...

    FTR, I was furious when we didn't go for it. I think I was actually more furious that hardly anyone I was watching with agreed with me than with the actual decision, but yeah, should've gone for it.

    The week before Baltimore only converted 3 or 10 short yardage plays. Not hard to see why they kicked when you see that number staring at them.

    bkmalik

  • The team in general, and the offense in particular, had the look of being on the ropes for much of the 1st quarter. The running game had not gotten going and we all remember how they got stuffed on the goal line the prior week on 4th down. I had no problem taking the 3 there, getting on the board, and basically settling everything down a little.

    joebookman

  • Totally unrelated to the current discussion, but is anyone amused by Pagano raiding the Steelers for his top assistants? Picked up Bruce Arians after he was "retired" for a week by Art Rooney and just took the heir to Dick Lebeau to be his DC. Butler had been the LB coach in Pittsburgh for the last 9 years was the guy that was going to replace Lebeau if time ever caught up to him.

    bkmalik

  • no one mentioning the Human Blinking Statue coming to Baltimore?

    indyumd

  • charmcity3131 said...

    This thread really went somewhere I didn't expect.

    We are just like the Philadelphia Eagles of the early 2000's. Very good, not good enough. I don't know how anyone can say John Harbaugh has been more successful than Brian Billick at this point. The goal is to win a Super Bowl. You don't get trophies for trips to the AFC championship game. When Harbaugh wins a Super Bowl, you can then have this debate. Harbaugh is closer to being infamous for his team's playoff chokes than famous for his team's playoff success.

    Did it occur to you that perhaps it's more that Flacco's ceiling is McNabb and not that the coaches stink?

    ravensnterps

  • ravensnterps said...

    Did it occur to you that perhaps it's more that Flacco's ceiling is McNabb and not that the coaches stink?

    Yup, it's Flacco's fault Evans didn't hold onto the perfectly thrown pass for a split second longer. Seriously dude, can you give the Flacco BS a fucking rest for at least the offseason?

    I got the shotgun. You got the briefcase. It's all in the game though, right?

    Omar Little

  • It's funny. One dropped pass and Harbaugh goes from "OMG what an awesome coach" to "can't win the big one". One play, that's all it took.

    jsh

  • Omar Little said...

    Yup, it's Flacco's fault Evans didn't hold onto the perfectly thrown pass for a split second longer. Seriously dude, can you give the Flacco BS a fucking rest for at least the offseason?

    Oh, I get it...It's Harbaugh's fault that Evans dropped that pass then.

    I was posting in response to Charmcity who seems discontent with harbaugh's coaching since we haven't been to a Superbowl when in reality the comparison should be between McNabb and Flacco IMO.

    ravensnterps

  • jsh said...

    It's funny. One dropped pass and Harbaugh goes from "OMG what an awesome coach" to "can't win the big one". One play, that's all it took.

    That's the nature of the beast.

    terps687

  • terps687 said...

    That's the nature of the beast.

    Definitely, and you can definitely determine fan intelligence when it comes to bitching about the HC/QB. It's lowest common denominator stuff.

    bkmalik

  • indyumd said...

    no one mentioning the Human Blinking Statue coming to Baltimore?

    It's as the QB coach, so [yawn] shrug

    bkmalik

  • Every fan base does this, but why can't it be more than one person's fault? Flacco wasn't perfect, Harbaugh wasn't perfect, Cundiff (obviously) wasn't perfect, Evans wasn't perfect, the O-line wasn't perfect, etc.

    In a game where so many little things could have happened differently to affect the outcome, why try so hard to pin it on one person?

    balderdash

    ZackGreinkeTerp

  • interesting perspective here from maryland beasketball...pre 02, were you one of the people who were impressed by the run of sweet sixteens or one of those lamenting not going further? Some people said gary was good, not great and couldnt win the big one. And add to that your biggest divisional rival is the one cashing those titles in. Once you do win, those sweet sixteens really fill out a resume of greatness. Without the gold, they can be made to look however critics want them to. same deal with harbs...hoepfully he will have the same result as gary did.

    BrotherAbstract

  • ZackGreinkeTerp said...

    Every fan base does this, but why can't it be more than one person's fault? Flacco wasn't perfect, Harbaugh wasn't perfect, Cundiff (obviously) wasn't perfect, Evans wasn't perfect, the O-line wasn't perfect, etc.

    In a game where so many little things could have happened differently to affect the outcome, why try so hard to pin it on one person?

    Because ravensnterps is a well established moron in particular when it comes to Flacco.

    In a game that close there were probably 25 plays that could have turned out ever so slightly different that would have changed the outcome. It is what it is.

    bkmalik

  • ZackGreinkeTerp said...

    Every fan base does this, but why can't it be more than one person's fault? Flacco wasn't perfect, Harbaugh wasn't perfect, Cundiff (obviously) wasn't perfect, Evans wasn't perfect, the O-line wasn't perfect, etc.

    In a game where so many little things could have happened differently to affect the outcome, why try so hard to pin it on one person?

    How lucky is Dickson that the game ended the way it did. Targeted 8 times in the playoffs and only had 3 catches. I don't have the dropped stats but I imagine it's pretty close to 5.

    Baldwin

  • bkmalik said...

    Because ravensnterps is a well established moron in particular when it comes to Flacco.

    In a game that close there were probably 25 plays that could have turned out ever so slightly different that would have changed the outcome. It is what it is.

    I didn't even see the game much less comment on it. I wasn't talking about the game. I was talking about the stupid notion that our ceiling is somehow the Eagles and that it's the fault of Harbaugh and that we should thusly fire him. If Harbaug his Reid than Flacco is McNabb. It's silly to think that either coaching combination doesn't have the ability to coach a Superbowl team.

    This post was edited by ravensnterps on 1/30/2012 at 10:34 AM

    ravensnterps

  • ZackGreinkeTerp said...

    Every fan base does this, but why can't it be more than one person's fault? Flacco wasn't perfect, Harbaugh wasn't perfect, Cundiff (obviously) wasn't perfect, Evans wasn't perfect, the O-line wasn't perfect, etc.

    In a game where so many little things could have happened differently to affect the outcome, why try so hard to pin it on one person?

    Because it's easy and people are dumb.

    Major Major

  • Major Major said...

    Because it's easy and people are dumb.

    It's really Randy Edsall's fault, anyway.

    ravensnterps