Online Now 1212

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

On this Board 327
Record: 2758 (12/1/2012)

Online now 1207
Record: 11761 (2/27/2012)

Boards ▾

Inside Scoop

The Web's No. 1 forum for coverage and discussion of Terps sports

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

Off-Topic

Test/Feedback Forum

Feedback for IMS and 247Sports

The Ticket Exchange

Reply

Official Ravens Off-Season Thread (Rice Signed)

  • Harbaugh calling out the Patriots.

    John Harbaugh of Baltimore Ravens says New England Patriots titles are

    Ravens coach John Harbaugh says the Patriots' titles are stained by Spygate.

    espn.go.com

    Attitude Reflects Leadership

    jps11673

  • jps11673 said...

    Harbaugh calling out the Patriots.

    Wow, shots fired! I thought Harbaugh and Belichick were buddies. Guess that's probably over. Good, eff the Patriots.

    I got the shotgun. You got the briefcase. It's all in the game though, right?

    Omar Little

  • chivas said...

    Cundiff is trash, next man up.

    Count me in as wanting a new kicker - I think Cundiff is done and with his terrible record from 50+ no way we should bring him back

    choptankterp

  • Ravens had an ok draft. It was clear this was just one of those years where we didn't get too lucky with certain players falling to us that we liked. I like the Upshaw pick and that worked out for us, but the second round tackle/guard has me concerned. I like the kid out of Delaware and I'm a huge fan of Pierce. Other than that, nothing to write home about.

    The Ravens only have themselves to blame for Cundiff's miss last year. They gave the dude a big contract for one really good year out of an otherwise journeyman type of career. He wasn't kicking balls nearly as far on kickoffs last year and was obviously really inaccurate from long distance. Injury played a role, but it should have been obvious to the Ravens late in the year that they should have rolled with Graham instead of Cundiff.

    charmcity3131

  • charmcity3131 said...

    but it should have been obvious to the Ravens late in the year that they should have rolled with Graham instead of Cundiff.

    Absolutely. But Harbs is a very loyal guy, sometimes loyal to a fault, unfortunately.

    terps687

  • terps687 said...

    Absolutely. But Harbs is a very loyal guy, sometimes loyal to a fault, unfortunately.

    absolutely - see Cameron, Cam and Rosburg

    omterps13

  • Omar Little said...

    Wow, shots fired! I thought Harbaugh and Belichick were buddies. Guess that's probably over. Good, eff the Patriots.

    I accept Harbaugh at his word/clarification that he was speaking to the perception of what those things can do to your accomplishments.

    http://espn.go.com/boston/nfl/story/_/id/7877552/john-harbaugh-baltimore-ravens-says-new-england-patriots-titles-stained-spygate

    Teddy Bruschi's response is pretty simple-minded to me. No doubt he worked hard. But there's no way for him to measure what impact the actions of other members of the team had on games. It's all about competitive advantage and the Pats had it. Even if Bruschi played by the rules, it doesn't mean his team did. Oh well, I can't remember all the details, maybe it didn't matter.

    indianajones4

  • how many super bowls did belichick and brady win before the taping of the other team's signals was caught? how many since?

    This post was edited by Esquireski on 5/1/2012 at 1:29 PM

    Esquireski

  • Esquireski said...

    how many super bowls did belichick and brady win before the taping of the other team's signals was caught? how many since?

    That's pretty lazy logic. A few plays either way and they could have 5 Super Bowls or 0 Super Bowls. They had the greatest regular season of all time after they were caught.

    This post was edited by IVWT on 5/1/2012 at 1:35 PM

    IVWT

  • IVWT said...

    That's pretty lazy logic.

    That's what I was trying to say above. It cuts both ways. I don't think we can just say that they'd of won no SB's sans cheating. At the same time, Bruschi's comments and outlook annoy me. It's probably tough for him to self-examine his organization or have his own work ethic compromised by the actions of others, but it's just reality. "I know I worked hard' is just lazy.

    indianajones4

  • IVWT said...

    That's pretty lazy logic. A few plays either way and they could have 5 Super Bowls or 0 Super Bowls. They had the greatest regular season of all time after they were caught.

    but you also can't say that the advantage of knowing what the other team is calling isn't that difference between winning and losing. and when they had that advantage they made those "few plays that could go either way" and haven't since.

    how much of an advantage does ray lewis or ed reed have because they can diagnose a play from formation due to film study in those seconds before the snap? it's what makes highlight plays for them.

    so how much of an advantage at critical times/before critical plays does an entire unit get if the coach has a tip on what scheme to play? if the difference is a few plays, then having that advantage has to count for something.

    or the nfl would let everyone do it.

    Esquireski

  • indianajones4 said...

    That's what I was trying to say above. It cuts both ways. I don't think we can just say that they'd of won no SB's sans cheating. At the same time, Bruschi's comments and outlook annoy me. It's probably tough for him to self-examine his organization or have his own work ethic compromised by the actions of others, but it's just reality. "I know I worked hard' is just lazy.

    i can see bruschi's point. he worked hard and still had to make the plays. but it's alot easier to make those plays when you are in the "right" defense or set to be positioned in the "right place" by the defensive call because you know what's coming.

    again, how many highlight plays have ed reed and ray lewis made because the diagnosed the play based off a set or tendency they studied? think what they could do if they knew the play that was signaled in...

    it's not the only reason for the super bowl victories, but it is an advantage only one team had and won with, while not duplicating that success without that advantage. it can't be overlooked.

    Esquireski

  • indianajones4 said...

    That's what I was trying to say above. It cuts both ways. I don't think we can just say that they'd of won no SB's sans cheating. At the same time, Bruschi's comments and outlook annoy me. It's probably tough for him to self-examine his organization or have his own work ethic compromised by the actions of others, but it's just reality. "I know I worked hard' is just lazy.

    You can work hard and cheat at the same time.

    bkmalik

  • LoL Harbaugh revising his previous comments.

    John Harbaugh: Patriots earned those championships | ProFootballTalk

    After saying in a radio interview that Spygate had the Patriots' championships, Ravens coach John Harbaugh has now revised and extended those remarks.

    profootballtalk.nbcsports.com

    Attitude Reflects Leadership

    jps11673

  • bkmalik said...

    You can work hard and cheat at the same time.

    That's what I was saying, just written out too fast and poorly worded. Bruschi's comments are pretty weak imo. Sadly the smart thing for Harbaugh to do is continue to clarify while Bruschi types bask.

    indianajones4

  • chivas said...

    Cundiff is trash, next man up.

    I would like to see some real.competition at K. Cundiff was money.two years ago. Not so much last year. I worry about him in the clutch again. Given lesser importance on ko distance, makes more sense to have a Stover type.

    34wassmooth

  • Esquireski said...

    i can see bruschi's point. he worked hard and still had to make the plays. but it's alot easier to make those plays when you are in the "right" defense or set to be positioned in the "right place" by the defensive call because you know what's coming.

    again, how many highlight plays have ed reed and ray lewis made because the diagnosed the play based off a set or tendency they studied? think what they could do if they knew the play that was signaled in...

    it's not the only reason for the super bowl victories, but it is an advantage only one team had and won with, while not duplicating that success without that advantage. it can't be overlooked.

    I think it's a huge stretch to think that just because you have seen a teams hand signals you know what plays they are going to run. What percentage of plays are called by hand signal rather than microphone? What percentage of hand signals are used the second time you face an opponent in a season?

    It's cheating that likely didn't have any impact on the outcome of any games.

    Baldwin

  • I can see Harbaughs point. The perception now is that those two teams had an unfair edge to win SuperBowls...may or not be fair. Doesn't matter though, they won the trophy and years from now no one will remember that there was even a hint of scandal.

    It's much like how people forget that two of the ***skins SuperBowls came in strike years, and their scab players won a lot of important divisional games that put them in the playoffs. Tainted but no one remembers.

    ravenlunatic

  • ravenlunatic said...

    It's much like how people forget that two of the ***skins SuperBowls came in strike years, and their scab players won a lot of important divisional games that put them in the playoffs. Tainted but no one remembers.

    Tainted? How are the Redskins' SB wins tainted? Did they cheat?

    Attitude Reflects Leadership

    jps11673

  • OK lets say they deserve asterisks. Thats fair.

    ravenlunatic

  • ravenlunatic said...

    OK lets say they deserve asterisks. Thats fair.

    Why would they deserve asterisks?

    Attitude Reflects Leadership

    jps11673

  • jps11673 said...

    Why would they deserve asterisks?

    allow me to do your work for you...take your time...

    It's much like how people forget that two of the ***skins SuperBowls came in strike years, and their scab players won a lot of important divisional games that put them in the playoffs. Tainted but no one remembers.

    ravenlunatic

  • I think they only played scab guys the second time around. The first strike year they just dramatically shortened the season so there were only 9 regular season games.

    mrterpfan

  • ravenlunatic said...

    allow me to do your work for you...take your time...

    It's much like how people forget that two of the ***skins SuperBowls came in strike years, and their scab players won a lot of important divisional games that put them in the playoffs. Tainted but no one remembers.

    No, I get your point. I'm just waiting for a valid one.

    Attitude Reflects Leadership

    jps11673

  • The seasons were not conducted under the same circumstances of those of other Super Bowl champions. Therefore, they deserve asterisks. This is not a difficult concept.

    aschaefe