-
winterps ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
2905 votes total - terps will win
- (6384)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
HEY you suck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1412 votes total - (1187)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HEY you suck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1412 votes total - (1187)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
terps687 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 83
4154 votes total - (10897)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HEY you suck said...
You guys are insane.
I'm obviously biased, since this issue effects me directly- but I can't see how ANYONE thinks this "needs to happen". It was proposed as a way to force a resolution that never came to fruition. The BCA was ridiculous to begin with- basically a bluff that got called. I don't think you understand how screwed EVERYONE will be if this goes into effect- not just assholes like me who make a living off government spending. Defense budget will be raped, social programs destroyed, health care initiatives striped... trillions of dollars cut off. This sounds all well-and-good in theory, but those trillions of dollars keep millions of people employed (many of them in this area). You're damned if you do, even more damned if you don't. Sequestration can't happen.
There is no easy fix. Entitlement programs are going to have to take a hit, it's unavoidable. Taxes... I won't even go there right now. With all the other crap that expires on December 31st, 2012, I'll be sure to enjoy my last awesome New Years eve for awhile.
-
frode said...
The alternative is to come to some sort of debt reduction agreement before the end of the year, that specifically nullifies sequestration. I'm not sure Congress can do something that big before the holidays, but maybe they can.
Sequestration is going to suck, no doubt. But when you put those cuts together with the way Obamacare is going to change the tax/spend agenda in 2013 and beyond, IMO this is something worth pursuing rather than trying to wiggle our way out of tough decisions with these stopgap agreements.
HEY you suck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1412 votes total - (1187)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HEY you suck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1412 votes total - (1187)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PaulUMD ●
- 4 stars Rating: 79
15945 votes total - 2006 Time Magazine Person of the Year
- (16704)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Joesmith32 said...
Newsflash. this isn't like what's been going on in the private sector - they aren't firing shitty performers or trimming costs, they are axing entire departments and putting hundreds of companies out of business, immediately. Regardless of how good they are, how important their project is, etc.
-
PaulUMD said...
Whatever they do it should be big, so it doesn't suck up the entire legislative bandwidth for the next couple years. Taxes, entitlements, debt ceiling, the whole shebang. Just get it done, even if they kick the sequester/Bush tax cuts an extra month or two down the road. It will be better to deal with it now.
Mr Tiffles7673
- 3 stars Rating: 49
3342 votes total - (2070)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
HEY you suck ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1412 votes total - (1187)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GunnerOne 84
- 5 stars Rating: 85
2067 votes total - (5186)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | 284

Sequestration, debt, and tax cuts