Online Now 1738

Off-Topic

On this Board 682
Record: 1825 (5/20/2013)

Online now 1616
Record: 11761 (2/27/2012)

Boards ▾

Inside Scoop

The Web's No. 1 forum for coverage and discussion of Terps sports

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

Off-Topic

Test/Feedback Forum

Feedback for IMS and 247Sports

The Ticket Exchange

Reply

Indecision 2012 - Stage of Grief: Acceptance (Northeast 4/24)

  • Kaisersayzo said...

    Did he really create jobs? I've still not seen any proof of that. He did create money...a lot of money...for himself and his partners....to store in accounts overseas.

    Agree about his general douchyness.

    Servants and grounds keeping jobs at his houses, plus construction jobs for those who build them.

    Comparing Mitts to people like Jobs & Gates & Ellison is a joke.

    What's his position on socializing the losses of the Morgan Stanley types and the big banks who wrecked the Economy, instead of subjecting them to the discipline of the Market as was done with the S&Ls in the 1980s?

    This post was edited by alexander2 on 1/20/2012 at 8:41 AM

    MARYLAND. The area they’re now calling the DMV—D.C./Maryland/Northern Virginia—might be the country’s richest talent mine.

    alexander2

  • The problem here for people like Mitt is this stance the Pubs have taken, basically considering rich people who invest or start businesses as "job creators." As if they're superhero civil servants, out there selflessly creating jobs for everyone. It's a step too far, and I don't think a lot of people buy that crap. It's like calling me a "wealth creator" because I blow all my money on big screen TVs, selflessly making Best Buy investors and TV manufactures richer!

    Like neal said, any decent candidate could create a narrative that pushes this overreach aside. But Mitt just adds to it, talking all this stuff about jobs he created at Bain, and all this funky math he uses to explain it as the numbers change. Nobody buys that. And the taxes thing? How awful does that look? And how did he not expect that question to come up last night?

    He should be talking about how he saved the Olympics. That's a real good story and he could say how he saved that enterprise just like he could save the country. It's not that hard. Maybe they're saving it for the general, but he's shown himself to be so weak recently I'm not sure it's going to matter.

    Moreover, he's such a douchebag he's actually making Gingrich seem more likable and authentic. Which is truly amazing.

    PaulUMD

  • The private sector don't create jobs -- the govement do. Everybody knows that.

    terp7475

  • If you don't think Mitt's business experience is something that qualifies him to be president, or that the negative sides of it need to also be brought to light, fine. But this total vilification of private equity and the attitude that all it does is create money for people who are already rich is just unbelievable to me. If that's the attitude of the Obama administration then we really cannot afford four more years. Full disclosure: I love domino's pizza.

    Edit to add that paul just addressed some of what I was getting at. I think it all boils down to Romney's personality. I've said it before, he's trying to run like Reagan but he doesn't have one iota of Reagan's charisma or genuineness.

    This post was edited by neal990 on 1/20/2012 at 8:57 AM

    neal990

  • neal990 said...

    If you don't think Mitt's business experience is something that qualifies him to be president, or that the negative sides of it need to also be brought to light, fine. But this total vilification of private equity and the attitude that all it does is create money for people who are already rich is just unbelievable to me. If that's the attitude of the Obama administration then we really cannot afford four more years. Full disclosure: I love domino's pizza.

    Edit to add that paul just addressed some of what I was getting at. I think it all boils down to Romney's personality. I've said it before, he's trying to run like Reagan but he doesn't have one iota of Reagan's charisma or genuineness.

    I agree with what you are saying and I think Paul nails Romney's biggest problem(s). I think his tax return issue is going to bite him in the ass as well and I honestly don't know what would hurt him the most...releasing them or not. He's screwed either way. If he releases them we're all going to find out that he made his millions while paying less in taxes than most americans. If he doesn't then people are going to assume that anyway. Either way it's not going to end well for him. Of course Newt also got rich lobbying for Fannie and Freddy so no one is exempt that really has a chance. Either way, Obama is going to beat them up over it...whoever is left standing.

    9/21/2010...RIP Old IMS.

    Kaisersayzo

  • Pajamas Media has a post today where they label Gingrich as "UIysses S. Gingrich".

    frode

  • neal990 said...

    If you don't think Mitt's business experience is something that qualifies him to be president, or that the negative sides of it need to also be brought to light, fine. But this total vilification of private equity and the attitude that all it does is create money for people who are already rich is just unbelievable to me. If that's the attitude of the Obama administration then we really cannot afford four more years. Full disclosure: I love domino's pizza.

    The attacks are coming mostly from his Republican opponents, not the Obama administration. They're the ones who began this line of attack.

    And pukeface

    Major Major

  • Major Major said...

    The attacks are coming mostly from his Republican opponents, not the Obama administration. They're the ones who began this line of attack.

    And

    Good point...last time I checked, I haven't heard Obama say one thing about any of this and this puts everything into quite a box. Hard to argue that these attacks are crossing the line in the future when they started the whole process. Newt will do ANYTHING to win this and if that involves destroying the eventual nominee in the primaries then so be it. Nothing new though...really.

    This post was edited by Kaisersayzo on 1/20/2012 at 9:11 AM

    9/21/2010...RIP Old IMS.

    Kaisersayzo

  • I have both worked with Bain and competed against Bain during the 80's and 90's. They may be data driven nerds, but all are very ethical. Romney is certainly a pragmatic investor and not a risk taker (he had to be dragged into some of the deals) but when he was convinced a deal made sense (of course from an investor's point of view) he bought in fully. He is a measured man, tries very hard to relate, but is definitely not a douche-bag. I do think he could manage the US better than a community organizer, but I really don't know why he wants to be in politics. Perhaps this is something he caught from his father.

    terp7475

  • Regardless of political affiliation, this is pretty pimp.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-hDt2E8MoE&feature=g-logo&context=G2e5c46bFOAAAAAAACAA

    I'll be pretty disappointed if I don't see a RNC ad with him singing this with a Solyndra logo next to him on screen.

    PaulUMD

  • PaulUMD said...

    Regardless of political affiliation, this is pretty pimp.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-hDt2E8MoE&feature=g-logo&context=G2e5c46bFOAAAAAAACAA

    I'll be pretty disappointed if I don't see a RNC ad with him singing this with a Solyndra logo next to him on screen.

    That would be great. Gut punching political ads go all the way back to GW's second election campaign. The fighting was over Alexander Hamilton's economic program. The program consisted of; encouraging domestic manufacturers via bridges, roads, canals and tariffs, the Federal Government assuming state debts incurred in the Revolutionary War, and creating the First Bank of the United States to handle the debt.

    Jefferson favored farmers and opposed the stretching of the Commerce Clause to create the Bank, since he feared it would lead to a Federal government dominating the states.

    This post was edited by alexander2 on 1/20/2012 at 10:03 AM

    MARYLAND. The area they’re now calling the DMV—D.C./Maryland/Northern Virginia—might be the country’s richest talent mine.

    alexander2

  • frode said...

    Pajamas Media has a post today where they label Gingrich as "UIysses S. Gingrich".

    Was hiking the Monocacy Battlefield in Urbana last weekend, and you can still see the farmhouse where he met to map out the Shenandoah Valley Campaign where he planned to burn everything a la Sherman's march to the sea. Dude did not mess around. Tho probably a drunk (how could you not be doing what he was doing) and not the best political or military tactician, saw the big picture and pursued victory at all costs. Great writer too. Back to the news....

    interpid

  • interpid said...

    Was hiking the Monocacy Battlefield in Urbana last weekend, and you can still see the farmhouse where he met to map out the Shenandoah Valley Campaign where he planned to burn everything a la Sherman's march to the sea. Dude did not mess around. Tho probably a drunk (how could you not be doing what he was doing) and not the best political or military tactician, saw the big picture and pursued victory at all costs. Great writer too. Back to the news....

    Sheridan or Grant ?

    MARYLAND. The area they’re now calling the DMV—D.C./Maryland/Northern Virginia—might be the country’s richest talent mine.

    alexander2

  • According to the marker, it was Sheridan meeting Grant.

    interpid

  • Not to turn the thread, but this is from the Park Service brochure:

    "In August of 1864, Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant stayed with the Thomas family and used their home to hold a "council of war." During that meeting, Grant confirmed with General Phil Sheridan a plan to secure and destroy Confederate resistance in the Shenandoah; a plan that Sheridan carried out in the fall of 1864."

    That was just a month after the battle that saved Washington. It's just a couple of miles from my house. It's still a great area (nothing like Antietam or Gettyburg tho), but it amazes me that I-270 literally cuts across the middle of the pivotal part of the battle where the vanguard Southern cavalry hoped to flank the outnumbered Northern defenders of the DC approach--but they encountered an experienced line of Union troops hidden behind hedges. Something like 13,000 South vs. 5,000 North with almost 2K casualties each side. South won the day, but the delay bought time to reinforce the DC forts and save the Capitol (South hoped a stealthy capture would relieve the siege of Richmond/Peterburg and hasten a negotiated settlment with the North). Farm is still a working farm today, but you can hike through the easements.

    interpid

  • interpid said...

    Not to turn the thread, but this is from the Park Service brochure:

    "In August of 1864, Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant stayed with the Thomas family and used their home to hold a "council of war." During that meeting, Grant confirmed with General Phil Sheridan a plan to secure and destroy Confederate resistance in the Shenandoah; a plan that Sheridan carried out in the fall of 1864."

    That was just a month after the battle that saved Washington. It's just a couple of miles from my house. It's still a great area (nothing like Antietam or Gettyburg tho), but it amazes me that I-270 literally cuts across the middle of the pivotal part of the battle where the vanguard Southern cavalry hoped to flank the outnumbered Northern defenders of the DC approach--but they encountered an experienced line of Union troops hidden behind hedges. Something like 13,000 South vs. 5,000 North with almost 2K casualties each side. South won the day, but the delay bought time to reinforce the DC forts and save the Capitol (South hoped a stealthy capture would relieve the siege of Richmond/Peterburg and hasten a negotiated settlment with the North). Farm is still a working farm today, but you can hike through the easements.

    My son and I stopped there this past summer. We had never been there before and the area is very nice. Didn't know about the Sheridan/Grant meeting house. Which house is it, the one on the West side of 270, the one near the Park HQ or the one on the east side of 270 that stands on a farm ?

    MARYLAND. The area they’re now calling the DMV—D.C./Maryland/Northern Virginia—might be the country’s richest talent mine.

    alexander2

  • It's the one on the East side of 270 that's still a working farm. When you walk the pasture of Thomas farm in winter, there's a great view of the Worthington Farm on the West side of 270 (the red house that's actually owned by the Park Service) and you can just see Johnny Reb's dismounted cavalry coming at you.

    interpid

  • neal990 said...

    If you don't think Mitt's business experience is something that qualifies him to be president, or that the negative sides of it need to also be brought to light, fine. But this total vilification of private equity and the attitude that all it does is create money for people who are already rich is just unbelievable to me. If that's the attitude of the Obama administration then we really cannot afford four more years. Full disclosure: I love domino's pizza.

    If he did weird offshore tax stuff that's fair game, but attacking him for being a successful equity manager is ridiculous. People are conflating Romney's work with "greedy Wall Street" because it's all "money stuff" they don't understand, but the difference between what Romney and other venture capitalists do and the speculative/predatory stuff that got Wall Street in trouble is night and day. Good equity firms save companies and create scores of jobs.

    This is part of the problem with the dumbed-down media these days - in another era someone would have actually tried to explain the difference. I'm a disaffected Republican who is probably not even going to vote for Romney in the general, but that line of attack is wrong and borderline offensive. He did something that brought great value to people and profited from it. Capitalism is _supposed_ to work that way.

    gocaps1

  • Colbert/Cain rally is huge and about to start.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/20/stephen-colbert-herman-cain-rally-live_n_1219204.html

    PaulUMD

  • so colbert is really trying to get people to vote for Cain because he's on the ballot?

    RDurr

  • Scarborough: Conservative Leaders All Tell Me They Want Brokered Convention | NewsBusters.org

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2012/01/20/scarborough-conservative-leaders-all-tell-me-they-want-brokered-co

    newsbusters.org

    frode

  • Cain kind of bombing this

    RDurr

  • I can't believe Herman Cain agreed to do this.

    zwterp08

  • zwterp08 said...

    I can't believe Herman Cain agreed to do this.

    He's got nothing better to do.

    PaulUMD

  • I really have no idea who the "conservative establishment" or "republican establishment" are that guys like JoScar talk about. But if they exist, maybe they should set about changing the nomination process, or at least making sure the first caucus can pick a winner in a timely fashion, rather than kvetching about those who navigate the process they endorsed or created.

    interpid