Online Now 1536

Off-Topic

On this Board 747
Record: 1825 (5/20/2013)

Online now 1527
Record: 11761 (2/27/2012)

Boards ▾

Inside Scoop

The Web's No. 1 forum for coverage and discussion of Terps sports

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

Off-Topic

Test/Feedback Forum

Feedback for IMS and 247Sports

The Ticket Exchange

Reply

Handgun Debate

  • Baldwin said...

    Obviously the kid wasn't suspicious just because he was wearing a hoodie, it's because he was hanging around, and allegedly looking in the windows of, a house that wasn't his.

    Not so obvious, actually.

    BrotherAbstract

  • BrotherAbstract said...

    Not so obvious, actually.

    Yeah, when he was on the phone with the dispatcher, he did not say anything about Martin looking into windows. Let's stop referring to that as suspicious activity because we don't have any reason to believe it was true right now. Baldwin, you are giving Zimmerman way too benefit of the doubt. Between his behavior and recent tendencies and the PD's crappy work, there's no reason to believe much of what was reported from his perspective.

    TerpPride

  • TerpPride said...

    Yeah, when he was on the phone with the dispatcher, he did not say anything about Martin looking into windows. Let's stop referring to that as suspicious activity because we don't have any reason to believe it was true right now. Baldwin, you are giving Zimmerman way too benefit of the doubt. Between his behavior and recent tendencies and the PD's crappy work, there's no reason to believe much of what was reported from his perspective.

    And I'll say this one more time...and I apologize for my language or if my time reference is wrong, but it was 7 fuckin pm. i hang around at 7PM and I'm an old ass! Hanging around at that time is not suspicious! Walking in the rain is not suspicious! Wearing a hoody in the rain is not suspicious! You know what would be suspicious to me? Some fuck following me around in the car at 7PM!

    Let's get our perspective straight for a moment.

    TerpPride

  • CaliforniaTerp said...

    [/b]When did "Hispanic" begin to mean non-white?[/b] The people in Spain are Hispanic by definition and they are equally as white as any Italian in Italy, Irish in Ireland, Russain in Russa, German in Germany or English in England.

    The day they started getting minority status.

    sniper_terp

  • The father released a statement.

    George Zimmerman's father on Trayvon Martin: My son is not racist, did not confront Trayvon Martin - Orlando Sentinel

    The Sanford Neighborhood Watch volunteer who shot and killed Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, did not instigate the encounter but has received death threats and moved out of his home, his

    articles.orlandosentinel.com

    sniper_terp

  • sniper_terp said...

    The father released a statement.

    The dispatcher asked him was he following Trayvon. Zimmerman said yes.

    This post was edited by reeceg1 on 3/23/2012 at 3:46 PM

    Layman ... Jake Layman!

    reeceg1

  • sniper_terp said...

    The father released a statement.

    The writing in that article was also tragic

    I felt like I should have issued an amber alert for myself, just in case

    DBlockTerp

  • ColbertRepor said...

    “I am urging the parents of black and Latino youngsters particularly to not let their children go out wearing hoodies,” Rivera said on “Fox & Friends.” “I think the hoodie is as much responsible for Trayvon Martin’s death as George Zimmerman was.”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74392.html#ixzz1pxXEWCzK

    Oh Geraldo thank you! I am happy me and my future children can wear the hoodies...just not those black kids...you might scare grandpa whitey!

    Proof that lawyer degrees come in Pez dispensers.

    SATerp

  • Sturm, Ruger runs out of guns on record demand...

    Ruger Corporate

    http://www.ruger.com/corporate/news/2012-03-21.html

    www.ruger.com

    Sdog

  • TerpPride said...

    Yeah, when he was on the phone with the dispatcher, he did not say anything about Martin looking into windows. Let's stop referring to that as suspicious activity because we don't have any reason to believe it was true right now. Baldwin, you are giving Zimmerman way too benefit of the doubt. Between his behavior and recent tendencies and the PD's crappy work, there's no reason to believe much of what was reported from his perspective.

    I've read that he was looking in windows, but it was not part of the 911 call, you're right.

    Do you acknowledge that Trayvon was standing next to a house and not just walking down the sidewalk? That could be a source of our miscommunication.

    Trayvon's girlfriend said that he took refuge from the rain at a random house and that's when Zimmerman saw him. Completely innocent action that also looks incredibly suspicious. Putting your hoodie up and running away when you see someone watching you is also completely innocent and is also exactly what someone would do if they were about to break into a house and noticed someone was there. If I saw someone doing that in my neighborhood with no history of break ins, I would take notice

    If you think he was just walking down the street and this guy thought being black while wearing a hoodie is suspicious and decided to call the police, I agree with you 100%. That's messed up and anyone who did that is a complete asshole and at the very least somewhat racist.

    I just don't think that's what happened based on the information given.

    Baldwin

  • http://abcnews.go.com/US/trayvon-martin-arrest-now-abc-reveals-crucial-phone/story?id=15959017

    This post was edited by reeceg1 on 3/23/2012 at 6:19 PM

    Layman ... Jake Layman!

    reeceg1

  • BrotherAbstract said...

    If the locals dont step up and do their jobs, i have a feeling the feds will step in and do it for them with some kind of civil rights deal.

    For them not even to arrest the guy is so mind numbing in 2012. Arrest him and let him prove self defense in court.

    Thread over IMO.

    That self-defense/stand your ground law has nothing to do with stalking innocent citizens and creating a problem that can then be trumped up as "self-defense."

    Jersyterrafirma

  • Jersyterrafirma said...

    Thread over IMO.

    That self-defense/stand your ground law has nothing to do with stalking innocent citizens and creating a problem that can then be trumped up as "self-defense."

    It has everything to do with it, which is why it is a controversial law and it's going to be held up to intense scrutiny as a result of this case.

    Edit: Of course I agree with you that it's horseshit that he's avoided arrest so far as a result of the law, but unless I'm confused the fact that he created the whole situation doesn't mean he can't then at some point feel threatened and use deadly force to defend himself according to "stand your ground." One of the lawyers probably knows better, but to me this seems like a pretty clear cut manslaughter case at the very least if it wasn't for that wacky law.

    This post was edited by TheGreenBastard on 3/23/2012 at 6:46 PM

    TheGreenBastard

  • Jersyterrafirma said...

    Thread over IMO.

    That self-defense/stand your ground law has nothing to do with stalking innocent citizens and creating a problem that can then be trumped up as "self-defense."

    The problem is that there's only one side to the story and in that story, Trayvon allegedly initiated contact and started the physical altercation.

    You could also add that the force you apply in "self defense" should not be allowed to greatly exceed the force you are facing. The fact that "He was punching me so I shot him" is a viable defense against murder is a HUGE problem. Where do you draw the line? If a 14 year old kid was getting ready to deliver an open handed slap, are you allowed to shoot him?

    Baldwin

  • Baldwin said...

    Where do you draw the line? If a 14 year old kid was getting ready to deliver an open handed slap, are you allowed to shoot him?

    Well, I'm no expert on these kinds of laws, living in MD and NJ for most of my life, but I think the intent is that yes, under those circumstances he IS allowed to shoot him.

    Based on a hypothetical you posted upthread I don't think you and I disagree, except that I think Zimmerman's story is BS and doesn't make any sense. In my opinion Zimmerman's admission that he was actively pursuing the kid is damning.

    I'm usually on board with your point of view on most issues, so I'm carefully weighing everything you've said...

    Jersyterrafirma

  • TheGreenBastard said...

    It has everything to do with it, which is why it is a controversial law and it's going to be held up to intense scrutiny as a result of this case.

    Edit: Of course I agree with you that it's horseshit that he's avoided arrest so far as a result of the law, but unless I'm confused the fact that he created the whole situation doesn't mean he can't then at some point feel threatened and use deadly force to defend himself according to "stand your ground." One of the lawyers probably knows better, but to me this seems like a pretty clear cut manslaughter case at the very least if it wasn't for that wacky law.

    Yeah, maybe I don't understand the spirit of that law. Did its creators intend to empower a guy to do what Zimmerman did (repeatedly)? I thought I heard a Florida lawmaker say something today to the effect of "this isn't what we meant..."

    But you're right, I shouldn't have been speaking out of my ass since I really don't know this statute or its intent...

    Jersyterrafirma

  • Jersyterrafirma said...

    Well, I'm no expert on these kinds of laws, living in MD and NJ for most of my life, but I think the intent is that yes, under those circumstances he IS allowed to shoot him.

    Based on a hypothetical you posted upthread I don't think you and I disagree, except that I think Zimmerman's story is BS and doesn't make any sense. In my opinion Zimmerman's admission that he was actively pursuing the kid is damning.

    I'm usually on board with your point of view on most issues, so I'm carefully weighing everything you've said...

    Yeah, it very well could be BS. He either followed the kid and confronted him or followed the kid, lost him and the kid confronted him as he returned to the car. Both stories sound plausible to me and no matter which happened, he's going to say that the kid started it.

    Baldwin

  • Jersyterrafirma said...

    Yeah, maybe I don't understand the spirit of that law. Did its creators intend to empower a guy to do what Zimmerman did (repeatedly)? I thought I heard a Florida lawmaker say something today to the effect of "this isn't what we meant..."

    But you're right, I shouldn't have been speaking out of my ass since I really don't know this statute or its intent...

    Well I think there were actually some even more damning stories about the shakiness of this law....like some gang fight where a bystander was caught in the crossfire and the shooter got off because according to stand your ground he is technically allowed to return fire if he fears for his life. Can't remember exactly but I think it was along those lines.

    I didn't mean you were wrong about whether or not Zimmerman SHOULD be able to get a pass on this, I just meant to say that the whole reason this case is murky is because of this dubious law.

    TheGreenBastard

  • I will play devil's advocate for a second. I think people should be a bit careful about blaming the prosecutors so much for not arresting this guy immediately. This is a murder case, if anything, and there is no statute of limitations on murder. One of the biggest dangers in prosecuting any murder case, and one of the ways in which prosecutors routinely get into trouble, is by indicting a person too quickly and not spending enough time gathering all the evidence and preparing the case. The problem with murder cases is that there is such public outcry that prosecutors are often forced into taking a course of action that may make the public feel better but may not be the most prudent course of action in terms of legal strategy and/or obtaining a conviction. I would typically have no problem whatsoever in a prosecutor waiting a month/months to gather all the evidence and continue with the investigation before arresting someone. This isn't nearly as much of an open and shut case as the public outcry would indicate. If this guy is arrested tomorrow and the case goes to trial in a few months, the prosecution would quite possibly have a difficult time meeting its burden.

    terps99

  • TheGreenBastard said...

    Well I think there were actually some even more damning stories about the shakiness of this law....like some gang fight where a bystander was caught in the crossfire and the shooter got off because according to stand your ground he is technically allowed to return fire if he fears for his life. Can't remember exactly but I think it was along those lines.

    I didn't mean you were wrong about whether or not Zimmerman SHOULD be able to get a pass on this, I just meant to say that the whole reason this case is murky is because of this dubious law.

    It really is insane. Like it covers thousands of scenarios but really only fits the single scenario of "I have a gun, someone is about to kill me so I kill him first. Everything besides that needs to be ignored. If you meet someone with deadly force and they respond with deadly force, you no longer get to claim self defense. If someone threatens to playfully push you in a swimming pool, you don't get to shoot them in self defense.

    Even if Zimmerman is telling the truth 100% and he was returning to his car after successfully detering a kid from breaking into a house with a can of ice tea when the 140lb kid attacks him from behind and starts beating his face in...you don't get to murder him because you don't want a black eye.

    Baldwin

  • so a white (non-hispanic) father and a white (hispanic) mother is a "multi-racial" family now? wtf is that

    RDurr

  • What difference does it make if the kid looked and acted suspiciously? IMO Zimmerman is a cop/security guard wannabe that spent years acting out his fantasy and doing his best to find trouble. I'm about as big of a 2A proponent as anyone here, but there's no way that idiot should have been permitted for CCW, way too many red flags. And I also don't have a problem with a periodic/yearly review of all CCW holders to look for just these kinds of radar hits.

    WTF

  • This case could be a case study for "innocent until proven guilty"

    MuddyLake

  • Bomani Jones did an excellent piece on this. The basic point is this:

    "But so many black men look suspicious. The elephant in the room in this case is how mainstream the belief is that black men look “suspicious.” I’ve seen the outrage from many white people — and black ones, for that matter — that this could happen, but not a lick of introspection."

    I find it pretty disheartening that much of the outrage is because Trayvon was the kind of black person that white America finds acceptable. As if it wouldn't have been a tragedy if the kid had a Philly beard, or wore his hat cocked to the side, or looked as menacing as Quincy Acy, or he was a D student. It feels like a lot of people are taking up the cause because this is an easy one to get behind. That way Zimmerman can go to jail, and people can just go back to the way they were before, without examining how mainstream these prejudices are.

    I've certainly been guilty of it myself despite knowing better, and there are times when I'll look back at a particular thought or behavior, and say to myself "What the fuck is wrong with you?"

    We have this mindset ingrained in us from the time we're born, it's a tangled issue, and one I'm not sure how we get past.

    Another derail, just because I love digging into crime statistics, five white people were murdered in Baltimore in 2011. One was shot in 1998 but died last year, one got hit by a car driven by a guy who was being chased by police after an attempted break-in, one got stabbed in the neck with a broken bottle at the July 4th fireworks during an argument, and one got shot and dumped in Leakin Park(where else?) by her boyfriend. Not one where a random black guy just stalked and killed whitey. One I definitely remember from 2010 was Hopkins researcher Steven Pitcairn, who was stabbed by two drug addicts during a robbery while he was on the phone with his mom, which was fucking heartbreaking.

    This post was edited by DBlockTerp on 3/24/2012 at 4:01 AM

    Trayvon Martin, And When A Black Man Deserves To Die | Media Personality | Bomani Jones

    Trayvon Martin, And When A Black Man Deserves To Die | Media Personality | Bomani Jones

    www.bomanijones.com

    I felt like I should have issued an amber alert for myself, just in case

    DBlockTerp

  • MuddyLake said...

    This case could be a case study for "innocent until proven guilty"

    Actually that is for the court to decide. This is a case study for proper investigations leading to an arrest. An arrest doesn't prove guilt.

    TerpPride