Online Now 1211

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

On this Board 140
Record: 4726 (10/4/2012)

Online now 1335
Record: 11761 (2/27/2012)

Boards ▾

Inside Scoop

The Web's No. 1 forum for coverage and discussion of Terps sports

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

Off-Topic

Test/Feedback Forum

Feedback for IMS and 247Sports

The Ticket Exchange

Reply

SI: Mark Turgeon at Fault for Terrapins NIT Fate

  • TheColfax said...

    interesting read

    Not very interesting.

    blerner1

  • i'm not sure why people feel the need to compare gary and turgeon these days. it makes no fucking difference if gary had better or worse teams and had more/less success with them. who gives a shit?

    my problem is that we haven't gotten any better, many of the freshman have taken steps BACKWARDS, our substitution patterns are mindless, we turn the ball over 50 times a game, and we look completely lost on offense more than half the time. how about instead of responding to the turnover questions with "that's who we are!" we address that problem and try to fix it? i see no progress so far and that's a huge problem. i'd have no problem with a NIT appearance this season if we showed that we improved throughout the season. it's pretty frustrating.

    AlphaOmega said... im sorry i was confusing...your "Superbowl" was the Redskins losing since you know that the Ravens cant win it all.

    TheHugeManatee

  • What was the Stoglin 'fiasco' he mentioned?

    http://twitter.com/insidemdsports

    JeffErmann

  • TheHugeManatee said...

    i'm not sure why people feel the need to compare gary and turgeon these days. it makes no fucking difference if gary had better or worse teams and had more/less success with them. who gives a shit?

    my problem is that we haven't gotten any better, many of the freshman have taken steps BACKWARDS, our substitution patterns are mindless, we turn the ball over 50 times a game, and we look completely lost on offense more than half the time. how about instead of responding to the turnover questions with "that's who we are!" we address that problem and try to fix it? i see no progress so far and that's a huge problem. i'd have no problem with a NIT appearance this season if we showed that we improved throughout the season. it's pretty frustrating.

    This is exactly why the "we're young" excuse is BS. Look at the freshmen over the course of the season:

    Allen: Strong against nonconference minnows, completely overmatched against conference foes. This is a huge concern.
    Layman: Improved as season has gone on, though seems to be struggling once again the last couple weeks
    Mitchell: Bout the same as nonconference
    Shaq: Bout the same as nonconference

    I'm not going to discuss Len because he's gone, but Wells still turns it over 5 times a game. Yes, maybe the freshmen will take big strides between their freshman and soph years. Maybe Wells improves with a full offseason in the program. MAYBE. These aren't sure things. And you'd be hard pressed to say Faust and Padgett have greatly improved from one year to the next under Turgeon. We're banking on an awful lot on "maybe's" right now and that can't make anyone feel too comfortable.

    terps687

  • terps08 said...

    What an uninformed piece of garbage. I'd be shocked if that "writer" has seen the Terps more than 3 times this year.

    Which of our players coming into this year was a proven above average ACC player? The 4 freshmen? No. Peshon? Lol no. Aronholt? No, very good player at a much lower level who filled a need but not proven at this level. Padge? No, seems like a hard worker but not talented enough to be even an average ACC starter. Len? World of potential but unproven. Faust? Had a nice freshmen year during which he was a solid ACC player. Dez? Played very well as the 4th option on a good team in a lesser conference. Certainly not proven as an above average starter at this level going into this year.

    That was the returning talent. So we were pinning our hopes that one returning player who was solid as a freshman in the ACC was going to carry our team? And guess what- it wasn't our freaking birth right that we even got Dez or Logan. Turge and his assistants and some lucky circumstances that made Dez available made that happen. If we don't land them then we would be seeing what a major rebuild is truly like. The announcers nailed it during the broadcast Wednesday- we are much further along in this rebuild than anyone could have realistically expected 2 years ago, and now some Terp fans are getting greedy.

    Easy to trash the players after what we've seen this season. You can blame the players so much until at SOME POINT you have to ask when does the blame go to the coach? He's the guy making $2M. And for what? What is the expectation? To take a team and make them better, play with passion, smarts and consisitency - and maybe show some progress? So based on the pathetic performance of the team this year, what is your expectation going forward? I recall when Dez became eligible, everyone was predicting a lock to make the dance. The worst part? Turge has never taken responsibility for the play of the team. Pathetic!

    lagunadave

  • Man, remember that guy Landon Milbourne who rode the bench his entire freshman season at Maryland and never got any better? Gary really blew it with him! That Milbourne guy never became a good player his junior and senior years. If only he had shown more improvement as a freshman! What was Gary doing??

    And what about that guy Christian Watford at, I forgot what school, maybe Indiana. He was really inconsistent his freshmen season and shot like 25% from the field down the final stretch of games. I wonder what happened to him. No way he's an impact player on a title contender now, shooting almost 50% from 3. He's probably playing in Romania or something.

    OregonTerp

  • terps687 said...

    This is exactly why the "we're young" excuse is BS. Look at the freshmen over the course of the season:

    Allen: Strong against nonconference minnows, completely overmatched against conference foes. This is a huge concern. Layman: Improved as season has gone on, though seems to be struggling once again the last couple weeks Mitchell: Bout the same as nonconference Shaq: Bout the same as nonconference

    I'm not going to discuss Len because he's gone, but Wells still turns it over 5 times a game. Yes, maybe the freshmen will take big strides between their freshman and soph years. Maybe Wells improves with a full offseason in the program. MAYBE. These aren't sure things. And you'd be hard pressed to say Faust and Padgett have greatly improved from one year to the next under Turgeon. We're banking on an awful lot on "maybe's" right now and that can't make anyone feel too comfortable.

    This sums up my feelings. Turgeon is responsible for the program. Period. No excuses. If he has another sub .500 conference record and fades down the stretch again next year things are going to be uncomfortable for him.

    xfreestater

  • lagunadave said...

    Easy to trash the players after what we've seen this season. You can blame the players so much until at SOME POINT you have to ask when does the blame go to the coach? He's the guy making $2M. And for what? What is the expectation? To take a team and make them better, play with passion, smarts and consisitency - and maybe show some progress? So based on the pathetic performance of the team this year, what is your expectation going forward? I recall when Dez became eligible, everyone was predicting a lock to make the dance. The worst part? Turge has never taken responsibility for the play of the team. Pathetic!

    I'm not trashing or blaming anyone right now. We have a lot of raw talent and a bright future IMO. No one should be trashing our players or our coach at this point.

    terps08

  • terps687 said...

    This is exactly why the "we're young" excuse is BS. Look at the freshmen over the course of the season:

    Allen: Strong against nonconference minnows, completely overmatched against conference foes. This is a huge concern. Layman: Improved as season has gone on, though seems to be struggling once again the last couple weeks Mitchell: Bout the same as nonconference Shaq: Bout the same as nonconference

    I'm not going to discuss Len because he's gone, but Wells still turns it over 5 times a game. Yes, maybe the freshmen will take big strides between their freshman and soph years. Maybe Wells improves with a full offseason in the program. MAYBE. These aren't sure things. And you'd be hard pressed to say Faust and Padgett have greatly improved from one year to the next under Turgeon. We're banking on an awful lot on "maybe's" right now and that can't make anyone feel too comfortable.

    How does any of that mean that the freshmen have taken steps backwards? Of course Allen looks better in the non-conference than in the conference. Layman seems to be struggling now after a few solid games? Seems like what a freshmen does. I don't know if there was a long enough string of good games from either one of those players to even be able to say that they are a good player. They haven't even established themselves as good players yet, so a string of average to bad games should be expected from players who at this point can only be described as average.

    JAWTerp

  • terps687 said...

    This is exactly why the "we're young" excuse is BS. Look at the freshmen over the course of the season:

    Allen: Strong against nonconference minnows, completely overmatched against conference foes. This is a huge concern.
    Layman: Improved as season has gone on, though seems to be struggling once again the last couple weeks
    Mitchell: Bout the same as nonconference
    Shaq: Bout the same as nonconference

    I'm not going to discuss Len because he's gone, but Wells still turns it over 5 times a game. Yes, maybe the freshmen will take big strides between their freshman and soph years. Maybe Wells improves with a full offseason in the program. MAYBE. These aren't sure things. And you'd be hard pressed to say Faust and Padgett have greatly improved from one year to the next under Turgeon. We're banking on an awful lot on "maybe's" right now and that can't make anyone feel too comfortable.

    I think that young players improve with time in the system and overall maturity/working on their games more often than not. I see your maybes as probablys which is a large part of why I think we'll be improved next year. We knew or should have known that the rebuilding process would hinge on our young guys developing since Turge wasn't left with a bunch of skilled upper classmen. So I'm not sure what else could be expected for our future other than hoping that the young guys do develop into good players.

    terps08

  • That article is a pretty poor critique of Turgeon's performance this season as I think there are more valid points to be made. I don't see Len's spotty performances as a major failure of Turgeon's doing. Problem is ALL of the players are inconsistent. They really don't have a reliable night-in-night-out player on the whole damn roster. They lost their leading scorer and only veteran leader/glue guy with over 120 starts while having a good, but not great, recruiting class coming in. Turgeon rolled the dice going into the season with a PG by committee consisting of a role player coming off a major knee injury, a lightly recruited volume scorer and a guy who is an off the ball wing player. Not surprisingly it didn't work. This past offseason he was still in tear down mode and getting rid of the majority of Gary's flotsam and jetsam remaining on the roster. Fair enough. He should have the guys he wants. He got lucky with Dez Wells being immediately eligible, without him the season would have been over more than a month ago, but he assembled a roster that had little cohesion and couldn't execute his preferred style of play. Some of that blame has to fall on his shoulders.

    microterp

  • OregonTerp said...

    FIRE JOHN CALIPARI! UK'S ON THE BUBBLE WITH ALL THOSE TALENTED FRESHMEN AND SOPHOMORES! HE STINKS!

    Funny you bring up Cal.

    Here are his comments after losing to UGA last night:

    "I am so disappointed in the job I've done with this team," Calipari said. "I've never had a team not cohesive this time of year. ... Every one of them had a will to win. Every one of them had a fight. Well, if this team doesn't have that, that's on me. What the heck did I do?"

    Turge Comments after UNC:

    “We really didn’t have a low-post game. They doubled the post. We got good looks; we have to knock them down. The first play of the game we made a bad decision. We had Logan [Aronhalt] open for three and Dez [Wells] turned the ball over trying to do something. Probably a few too many threes. We were right on the break, and Nick [Faust] instead of going in for a layup pulled up for three, which makes no sense to me. I have to keep coaching them the best I can. Carolina had to be good and they were really good, especially Bullock.”

    TheRiddler

  • JAWTerp said...

    How does any of that mean that the freshmen have taken steps backwards? Of course Allen looks better in the non-conference than in the conference. Layman seems to be struggling now after a few solid games? Seems like what a freshmen does. I don't know if there was a long enough string of good games from either one of those players to even be able to say that they are a good player. They haven't even established themselves as good players yet, so a string of average to bad games should be expected from players who at this point can only be described as average.

    I agree they might not even be good players. Not sure how that really differs from my post or gives us reason to be optimistic about the future.

    terps687

  • The ''they're only freshmen" point...by now, they're essentially sophomores. Hasn't seemed to be much improvement over the season, no consistent outside shooting, no PG, massive TOs. Some of these are on the coach, while the in-game decisions (substitiutions, etc.) are certainly on him. Maybe the expectations were too high, but some of this is on the HC. Some guys improve over time (Landon, Rodney, Dino) some really don't i.e. James, PeShon. Future is still very much up in the air. I'm hopeful, in part since we have so many young guys, some of them have to improve.

    Nocalterp

  • TheRiddler said...

    Funny you bring up Cal.

    Here are his comments after losing to UGA last night:

    "I am so disappointed in the job I've done with this team," Calipari said. "I've never had a team not cohesive this time of year. ... Every one of them had a will to win. Every one of them had a fight. Well, if this team doesn't have that, that's on me. What the heck did I do?"

    Turge Comments after UNC:

    “We really didn’t have a low-post game. They doubled the post. We got good looks; we have to knock them down. The first play of the game we made a bad decision. We had Logan [Aronhalt] open for three and Dez [Wells] turned the ball over trying to do something. Probably a few too many threes. We were right on the break, and Nick [Faust] instead of going in for a layup pulled up for three, which makes no sense to me. I have to keep coaching them the best I can. Carolina had to be good and they were really good, especially Bullock.”

    Pretty good post there, Riddler...

    Jersyterrafirma

  • terps687 said...

    I agree they might not even be good players. Not sure how that really differs from my post or gives us reason to be optimistic about the future.

    Well, a good number of them are also young players. Young players often blow hot or cold from game-to-game. But, it is hard to just have faith that they will improve in the offseason. It doesn't always work out that way.

    JAWTerp

  • TheRiddler said...

    Funny you bring up Cal.

    Here are his comments after losing to UGA last night:

    "I am so disappointed in the job I've done with this team," Calipari said. "I've never had a team not cohesive this time of year. ... Every one of them had a will to win. Every one of them had a fight. Well, if this team doesn't have that, that's on me. What the heck did I do?"

    Turge Comments after UNC:

    “We really didn’t have a low-post game. They doubled the post. We got good looks; we have to knock them down. The first play of the game we made a bad decision. We had Logan [Aronhalt] open for three and Dez [Wells] turned the ball over trying to do something. Probably a few too many threes. We were right on the break, and Nick [Faust] instead of going in for a layup pulled up for three, which makes no sense to me. I have to keep coaching them the best I can. Carolina had to be good and they were really good, especially Bullock.”

    Wow

    1thegame

  • TheRiddler said...

    Funny you bring up Cal.

    Here are his comments after losing to UGA last night:

    "I am so disappointed in the job I've done with this team," Calipari said. "I've never had a team not cohesive this time of year. ... Every one of them had a will to win. Every one of them had a fight. Well, if this team doesn't have that, that's on me. What the heck did I do?"

    Turge Comments after UNC:

    “We really didn’t have a low-post game. They doubled the post. We got good looks; we have to knock them down. The first play of the game we made a bad decision. We had Logan [Aronhalt] open for three and Dez [Wells] turned the ball over trying to do something. Probably a few too many threes. We were right on the break, and Nick [Faust] instead of going in for a layup pulled up for three, which makes no sense to me. I have to keep coaching them the best I can. Carolina had to be good and they were really good, especially Bullock.”

    I despise cal for all the obvious reasons but you have to respect coaches who take the hits for their players, even if the players dont deserve it. Those defending Turge from criticism need to note that he is ready, willing and able to blame others publicly first so turnabout is absolutely fair play, as long as it is reasonable.

    This post was edited by BrotherAbstract on 3/8/2013 at 12:17 PM

    BrotherAbstract

  • this whole debate is not properly bound. the question is not whether turgeon is doing a good job with maryland, because he is very obviously not, but whether someone else, someone we could realistically hire (not sean miller), could do better.

    ghostofobina

  • Nocalterp said...

    The ''they're only freshmen" point...by now, they're essentially sophomores. Hasn't seemed to be much improvement over the season, no consistent outside shooting, no PG, massive TOs. Some of these are on the coach, while the in-game decisions (substitiutions, etc.) are certainly on him. Maybe the expectations were too high, but some of this is on the HC. Some guys improve over time (Landon, Rodney, Dino) some really don't i.e. James, PeShon. Future is still very much up in the air. I'm hopeful, in part since we have so many young guys, some of them have to improve.

    agree, the Landon, Rodney, Dino guys are a different animal and couldn't even break into the rotation to improve in game during their early years. Our guys are getting minutes and we should see some marked improvement...you would not expect to see a freshman Landon come off the bench in march to contribute because he's not playing 10-25 minutes a game!

    again, the new age of basketball is to get the best players, over recruit positions and then get them good by the end of the year. That is the measuring stick now. If Turge had a roster full of Landons, dinos and Rodneys we would not be having this discussion.

    TerpPride

  • ghostofobina said...

    the question is not whether turgeon is doing a good job with maryland, because he is very obviously not

    no, that's not 'very obvious' at all. We were picked to finish 6th in the ACC. We are 6th. We are much better than a year ago.

    peteholbertsbak

  • One weakness of this team is a lack of confidence. I think it's an important part of coaching but rarely discussed. Coaches need to understand what motivates a player and conversely what breaks him down. Len, Faust, Allen, Howard and maybe Layman all underperform because of lack of confidence, imho. This concerns me about Turge. And yes, it is a big part of his job as coach.

    Missouriterp

  • peteholbertsbak said...

    no, that's not 'very obvious' at all. We were picked to finish 6th in the ACC. We are 6th. We are much better than a year ago.

    i feel sad - the fanbase's expectation for year two under turge is nit.

    ghostofobina

  • "We talked about it, but we've got a couple of guys that are basically not real coachable. You tell them over and over and over what you want them to do, what we have to do, and they do their own thing. That's where we are. When they realize if we don't do this all together we're going to have many more of these, then (it will) change.”

    “They deserved to beat us by 50 today,” Kentucky coach John Calipari said. “They played harder. They played rougher. They
    executed better. They were stronger with the ball. We just had passive guys who did not want to make plays. (We were) tentative.”

    Calipari "taking the blame" post 30 point loss to Tennessee

    And here's Turge post Duke taking some blame for prior struggles:

    "It has been a hard week. I take a lot of pride in my coaching. I don't do a lot of things well, but I like to think that I can coach a little bit, and I haven't done a very good job. It has been a hard week on my family, hard on my son last week. He had to leave the stands because the fans were so hard on his dad. This win was for my family and the fans. I know what this win means for our fan base and I really wanted to beat Duke. This means a lot to me. Over the summer I said if we beat Duke I am going to be in the stands with our fans."

    terps08

  • ghostofobina said...

    i feel sad - the fanbase's expectation for year two under turge is nit.

    Good Lord....do you have no recollection of where we were post Gary!?!?

    terps08