Online Now 1214

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

On this Board 202
Record: 4726 (10/4/2012)

Online now 1175
Record: 11761 (2/27/2012)

Boards ▾

Inside Scoop

The Web's No. 1 forum for coverage and discussion of Terps sports

Terps Sports

Visitor discussion of University of Maryland and college sports

General Sports Water Cooler

A place for lively discussion for all other sports unrelated to Maryland athletics

Off-Topic

Test/Feedback Forum

Feedback for IMS and 247Sports

The Ticket Exchange

Reply

Hoops lineup

  • I guess I get 4 DV per day, 'cause that is all I was able to use in this thread.

    flaTerp

  • Paulyboy50 said...

    Whoa. I agree that Padge should and will probably start, but comparing him to senior dino or junior gist is a bit of a stretch. Stats aside, junior gist or senior dino would've been the second best player on our team last year (throughout the whole year at least). They both played on much better teams that had more options, and they did not get nearly as many offensive rebounds from throwing the ball at the bottom of the rim and catching it 3 times in a row. Dino and Gist were also much more rounded players who could hit shots more than 4 feet from the basket.

    ignore the stats in favor of your completely biased opinion?

    guess what, padge was the second best player on our team last year, or pretty damn close to it. he had the second most number of field goals, and the most rebounds. obviously arguments can be made for mosley too, and i wouldn't necessarily argue with you.

    This post was edited by RDurr on 5/4/2012 at 12:19 PM

    RDurr

  • RDurr said...

    so our best big (by far) isn't even your first big off the bench? sub-RD52 caliber analysis

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion and mine is that of Padge while solid is not as good as most believe he looked much better because everyone else on the team (in regards to BIGS) was terrible. I'm saying and will stand by the fact that I think Cleare and Mitchell will beat him out for playing time. This isn't Gary Williams on the sideline who was notorious for starting players based on seniority Gary had that luxury with his resume and Turge has to put the BEST players on the court and I believe that through practice and pre-season that Cleare and Mitchell will prove that they deserve to be in the line up more than Padge.

    NavyDoc1969

  • NavyDoc1969 said...

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion and mine is that of Padge while solid is not as good as most believe he looked much better because everyone else on the team (in regards to BIGS) was terrible. I'm saying and will stand by the fact that I think Cleare and Mitchell will beat him out for playing time. This isn't Gary Williams on the sideline who was notorious for starting players based on seniority Gary had that luxury with his resume and Turge has to put the BEST players on the court and I believe that through practice and pre-season that Cleare and Mitchell will prove that they deserve to be in the line up more than Padge.

    if turge is putting the BEST players on the court he will certainly be putting our BEST returning player on the court.

    RDurr

  • RDurr said...

    if turge is putting the BEST players on the court he will certainly be putting our BEST returning player on the court.

    Faust is our best returning player, but your point is still valid.

    NavyDoc, I hope you are right. If Cleare AND Mitchell walk onto campus better than Sr. Padgett then we are in for a good year.

    UMClassof90

  • RDurr said...

    ignore the stats in favor of your completely biased opinion?

    guess what, padge was the second best player on our team last year, or pretty damn close to it. he had the second most number of field goals, and the most rebounds. obviously arguments can be made for mosley too, and i wouldn't necessarily argue with you.

    I am biased, I liked Dino a lot. I do think that he would've put up better numbers than padge on last year's team ,though. Two seasons ago, if the ball was fed into the paint, it was going to Williams. The only thing I'll give Padge over Dino is rebounding, Dino was significantly better in ever other aspect of the game (IMO).

    I guess you could say Padge was the second best player this year, but that just makes me sad to think about.

    Paulyboy50

  • Not reading this whole thread, but Faust, Allen, Len, and Padgett are all locks to start.

    ravensnterps

  • Paulyboy50 said...

    The only thing I'll give Padge over Dino is rebounding, Dino was significantly better in ever other aspect of the game (IMO).

    Padgett is also significantly better when it comes to post offense, which is basically his entire offense. So yeah, that's a pretty big deal.

    iheartjamesgist

  • ravensnterps said...

    Not reading this whole thread, but Faust, Allen, Len, and Padgett are all locks to start.

    Allen?

    Not saying he won't, but a "lock"?

    sgii

  • UMClassof90 said...

    Dino was a fine player, but his Senior numbers were worse than Padgett's Junior numbers and that team also missed the post-season completely. If you think a 5.8 rpg PF is better than Padgett then we'll just have to not agree.

    This. We were KILLING Dino for his entire Terps career up until the final 12 or so games he played.

    He was the ultimate 25 minutes played, 3 shots, 2 rebounds, 2 points guy.

    XrisTerp

  • And I'm still not sure if people are likely overrating the newcomers or underrating Padgett. The only real thing we can compare of the two is what they've done in high school. People have been pretty high on Shaq and Mitchell because of how well they performed at the Capital Classic. That said, when Padgett was in high school he absolutely dominated the Charm City Classic (which is basically what the Cap Classic has become) scoring 22 points on 11-13 shooting.

    Would any of you suggest that Padgett hasn't improved? We all saw him play his first 2 seasons here. He was wild, out of control, and unskilled. Last season he was an immensely improved player, and someone we could rely on inside.

    This leads me to believe that the real thing some people are underrating is the massive jump in the level of competition between high school basketball and ACC basketball. We've seen these incoming recruits play, and we've liked a lot of the things we've seen, but it's been against other high schoolers. James Padgett was very good against high school players as well, but the transition to the ACC was very difficult. Sure, I'm expecting it to be a bit smoother for the newcomers, maybe something between Padgett's and Jordan's transition, but it's still going to be tough, and they're not going to be able to do all the things they're doing against high schoolers.

    Padgett is not an All-American or anywhere near it, but he's a solid starter who should be able to keep the seat warm while these freshmen learn what ACC basketball is all about. I'm pretty confident that Shaq and Mitchell will be better in time than what Padgett is now, but it's likely not going to happen over night.

    iheartjamesgist

  • ravensnterps said...

    Not reading this whole thread, but Faust, Allen, Len, and Padgett are all locks to start.

    Allen isn't a lock at all, but with Stoglin's departure a freshman will start. Either Faust will play the 2 and Layman will start at the 3 OR Faust will play the 3 and Allen/Cassell will play the 2.

    If Pe'Shon's injury problems continue or he is slow to recover, then we'll be starting 2 freshman and we'll be looking at 4 or 5 ACC wins.

    UMClassof90

  • I wouldn't count on Pe'shon for anything. Last season his first injury robbed him of all of his explosiveness, and his second injury (and missed practice time) will probably prevent improvement. He also shot the ball horribly. I think Seth Allen will be much better than Pe' immediately, but if he isn't we'll be in for a very rough season.

    srterp

  • Padgett is not an All-American or anywhere near it, but he's a solid starter who should be able to keep the seat warm while these freshmen learn what ACC basketball is all about. I'm pretty confident that Shaq and Mitchell will be better in time than what Padgett is now, but it's likely not going to happen over night.

    We don't have to compare Padgett to Shaq and Mitchell. Just compare Junior Padgett to Freshman Jordan. I expect Shaq to be much better than Padgett.

    Come on out and get your whoopin!

    CaliforniaTerp

  • CaliforniaTerp said...

    We don't have to compare Padgett to Shaq and Mitchell. Just compare Junior Padgett to Freshman Jordan. I expect Shaq to be much better than Padgett.

    jordan williams put up ROY numbers in his freshman year. we'd all be ecstatic if he's that good. Padge put up 9 pt and 6 rb last year. the following bigs did not produce that much in their freshman season:

    lonny baxter
    nik caner-medley
    james gist
    terrence morris
    chris wilcox

    as far as i can tell, in the gary era only williams and booth did it. if shaq is keith booth, awesome. but you all are underestimating how rare that is. especially for a kid who lacks the conditioning to play college basketball at the moment.

    padge is going to go out there, put up 12 and 7, and be an above average PF. if shaq is "much better" than that as you say, we have the national rookie of the year on the roster and we will all be happy.

    RDurr

  • RDurr said...

    as far as i can tell, in the gary era only williams and booth did it. if shaq is keith booth, awesome. but you all are underestimating how rare that is. especially for a kid who lacks the conditioning to play college basketball at the moment.

    And Joe Smith, but you are 100% correct. People are insane thinking you can plug these guys in for double doubles from the get.

    UMClassof90

  • UMClassof90 said...

    And Joe Smith, but you are 100% correct. People are insane thinking you can plug these guys in for double doubles from the get.

    I'm not expecting double/doubles from the Fresh, but 8-5 from a Fresh is better than 9-6 from a Jr.

    Come on out and get your whoopin!

    CaliforniaTerp

  • CaliforniaTerp said...

    I'm not expecting double/doubles from the Fresh, but 8-5 from a Fresh is better than 9-6 from a Jr.

    what makes you think padgett will stay the same or regress? he played his best ball in acc play. you people are dense as hell, wanting to play freshman for the experience despite it putting us at a huge competitive disadvantage on the court. lets win less games, good idea.

    RDurr

  • CaliforniaTerp said...

    I'm not expecting double/doubles from the Fresh, but 8-5 from a Fresh is better than 9-6 from a Jr.

    No, it's not, but do you think one will play all the minutes and the other won't play at all? Do you think they'll still practice?

    This thread is getting stupider.

    UMClassof90

  • no chance I'm reading this, but anyone hating on Padge wasn't paying attention last year.

    TheColfax

  • RDurr said...

    what makes you think padgett will stay the same or regress? he played his best ball in acc play. you people are dense as hell, wanting to play freshman for the experience despite it putting us at a huge competitive disadvantage on the court. lets win less games, good idea.

    You know that Padgett's stats are only slightly better than Len's (8-5) and Len missed the creampuff part of the schedule. James will play as a Senior, but he is going to have to beat out a freshman (Shaq) if he wants to continue being a starter. This is not hate.

    Come on out and get your whoopin!

    CaliforniaTerp

  • CaliforniaTerp said...

    We don't have to compare Padgett to Shaq and Mitchell. Just compare Junior Padgett to Freshman Jordan. I expect Shaq to be much better than Padgett.

    This is hands down the dumbest post I've ever read. Or at least that's what I thought until I read your next one, the moronic one where you said 8-5 is better than 9-6 (and yes I left out the FR vs JR part of that because it is 100% IRRELEVANT!).

    I really don't know what to think anymore. Apparently logic is just too much of a foreign concept to some people.

    iheartjamesgist

  • iheartjamesgist said...

    This is hands down the dumbest post I've ever read. Or at least that's what I thought until I read your next one, the moronic one where you said 8-5 is better than 9-6 (and yes I left out the FR vs JR part of that because it is 100% IRRELEVANT!).

    I really don't know what to think anymore. Apparently logic is just too much of a foreign concept to some people.

    U/V.

    Multiple posters think less pts and less rbs are better if a player is younger.

    This is the wrongest thing I've ever read on this board.

    UMClassof90

  • RDurr said...

    we're entering round 10 of RD52 vs. Logic

    Logic has been redshirted.....

    softground

  • CaliforniaTerp said...

    I'm not expecting double/doubles from the Fresh, but 8-5 from a Fresh is better than 9-6 from a Jr.

    Not to bring math into the discussion, but isn't 9 points more than 8 ?
    Didn't run the numbers on the rebounds. If someone has the time, check it out. I'm guessing the results will be similar.

    softground