-
UKDUDE2 said...
Now, I had some respect for Maryland as a program, and their fan base, all up until this statement right here. Reasoning?: 1. False accusations, if I'm correct with our legal system in America, it is innocent until proven guilty, thus how about you go by so? 2. Your statement generalizing an entire fan base on a few people is ludicrous and completely off. 3. So by your logic, no matter what coach a top 5/10 player played for, they'd be top 5/10 picks regardless? Let's name a few names that don't fit the category, make any excuse you want for them again, but honestly. Let's start with Harrison Barnes (Projected #1 overall, and had Kobe comparisons until arriving on campus, enough said), Jared Sullinger, Josh Selby, Tobias Harris, Perry Jones III, Will Barton, Quincy Miller, Avery Bradley, Xavier Henry, John Henson, Renardo Sidney, Kenny Boynton, all fit the bill of that. Even more? Ok. Brandon Jennings, Samardo Samuels, Jrue Holliday, JaMychal Green, Scotty Hopson, Nick Calathes. Honestly dude, I can go all day. Just because you're a top 10 recruit, does NOT mean you will be a top 10 or even 15 draft pick. It's just not going to happen. Given ALL of these examples to refute your claim, you cannot sit here and still claim to me, that the coach you pick does not matter at all. Because let's see, Quincy Miller, 38th overall pick, Renardo Sidney, undrafted, Nick Calathes, somewhere in Europe. Will Barton, 40th overall pick, Kenny Boynton, still in school, Brandon Jennings, 10th overall. Now here's where I can definitely prove you wrong once and for all. Jennings is the only player in ESPN's recruiting that has EVER been rated a 99. The score is on a scale of about 70-100. Even Harrison Barnes with his out of this world expectations was a 98. Jennings wanted money immediately and it paid in the long run, as he fell to 10th in the draft, while had he probably stayed in the USA and played for a good coach, he could have very possibly been the #1 overall pick in a draft. It's just the way it is, whether it be the coach's history that helps draft stock, or the coach actually helps the player improve, it most definitely CAN have a significant impact.
indianajones4 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
1833 votes total - (2625)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
indianajones4 said...
1. This is one of the points I have the most difficulty disputing, because you're right, innocent until proven guilty is legit. But here's the thing and you have to recognize this: It's become the battle cry of anyone out there who dodges the NCAA bullet. So it goes in our legal system, we are all innocent until proven guilty. But it's not apples to apples. Our legal system also ensures a right to quick and speedy trials. College basketball ethics are governed by an NCAA that punishes USC/Reggie Bush years after the fact, tends to go light on its breadwinners, and is totally outpaced by the infastructures used to funnel $ incentives to players and power-brokers.
I understand the innocence until proven guilty. I really do. But you'll excuse many out there if the words ring hollow. I think we need to be responsible about throwing out accusations and I think it needs to be measured. But to an extent, I don't mind and in fact count on the court of public opinion scrutinizing what the NCAA so rarely can.
In Calipari's case, there's smoke. In the case of the 2 erased final fours, his name isn't mentioned. Camby receives something like 30k in benefits from an agent and Derek Rose gets by with suspect test scores. Both kids are technically ineligible so the final 4's are stripped (look no further than Maggette and Thomas come awfully close to mirroring these examples and Duke going unscathed for questions about the NCAAs consistency). But when you look Calipari across the board, you can make a strong case for failing to see a program of compliance. This is basically the language that condemned Calhoun so there's a precedent.
To his time at Kentucky. First, I think that the pedigree of Kentucky puts a bigger limit on the underhanded stuff. A blueblood like that sells itself more than Mass/Memphis. But here's the thing. Kentucky always knew what it was hiring. Hire Cal and you hire his relationships. Cal gets gutted in the court of public opinion because he is the face of a one and done system that's nearly professionalized the entire game. The next jump in logic is that those kids are almost all the elite (we're talking 4, top 10 kids a class or so). It's pretty well thought, that top 10 kids get paid, or their inner circle taken care of. The stuff operates through a vast infastructure of handlers/brokers/agents of which Cal has the creme de la creme in Nike/CAA/Wes/booster backing. Yes, the NBA fast track is a huge sell and the gift that keeps on giving. But a lotta top 10 kids tend to be pricey. Cal has gotten a lot of them. You do the math. There's no bag man or paper trail. All he has to do is turn a blind eye and let it happen.
False accusations, fine. Techincally your right. But I think the difference ultimately lies in what's cheating and some angst as to why Cal bears the brunt of the accusations. I don't think Cal touches money, ever. But I think somewhere along the way he networked and mobilized an infastructure that does his bidding when needed. I also think there is a laundry list of high-major programs that do the same thing.
2. Generalizing fan bases or any group sucks. But we do it all the time in sports. "Duke fans" are so entitled. "Kentucky fans" are so naive. It's mostly just a lazy way of saying stuff.
3. Tahj handled this one. The main point I'd make is that Calipari's an underrated floor coach. His teams are good defensively and he tends to make a team of individuals. But his player development/nba turnover is probably overblown. He's getting a great product coming in with most kids. These aren't fringe top 50's puddle jumping into the lottery. A lot of these kids are doing what they'd of done anyway outta highschool had Stern not floored the age limit. The Draft trends on potential and most of these kids are cashing in regardless of college destination (though there have been notable failures or kids who can't outlast their rookie contract). Cal's helped some kids. But there's no way to really quantify if Billy Donovan or Rick Pitino couldn't have matured kid x or kid y the same way.
-
UKDUDE2 said...
Now, I had some respect for Maryland as a program, and their fan base, all up until this statement right here. Reasoning?: 1. False accusations, if I'm correct with our legal system in America, it is innocent until proven guilty, thus how about you go by so? 2. Your statement generalizing an entire fan base on a few people is ludicrous and completely off. 3. So by your logic, no matter what coach a top 5/10 player played for, they'd be top 5/10 picks regardless? Let's name a few names that don't fit the category, make any excuse you want for them again, but honestly. Let's start with Harrison Barnes (Projected #1 overall, and had Kobe comparisons until arriving on campus, enough said), Jared Sullinger, Josh Selby, Tobias Harris, Perry Jones III, Will Barton, Quincy Miller, Avery Bradley, Xavier Henry, John Henson, Renardo Sidney, Kenny Boynton, all fit the bill of that. Even more? Ok. Brandon Jennings, Samardo Samuels, Jrue Holliday, JaMychal Green, Scotty Hopson, Nick Calathes. Honestly dude, I can go all day. Just because you're a top 10 recruit, does NOT mean you will be a top 10 or even 15 draft pick. It's just not going to happen. Given ALL of these examples to refute your claim, you cannot sit here and still claim to me, that the coach you pick does not matter at all. Because let's see, Quincy Miller, 38th overall pick, Renardo Sidney, undrafted, Nick Calathes, somewhere in Europe. Will Barton, 40th overall pick, Kenny Boynton, still in school, Brandon Jennings, 10th overall. Now here's where I can definitely prove you wrong once and for all. Jennings is the only player in ESPN's recruiting that has EVER been rated a 99. The score is on a scale of about 70-100. Even Harrison Barnes with his out of this world expectations was a 98. Jennings wanted money immediately and it paid in the long run, as he fell to 10th in the draft, while had he probably stayed in the USA and played for a good coach, he could have very possibly been the #1 overall pick in a draft. It's just the way it is, whether it be the coach's history that helps draft stock, or the coach actually helps the player improve, it most definitely CAN have a significant impact.
Justerp
- 4 stars Rating: 68
3370 votes total - Outkicking the Coverage Since Day 1 .
- (2167)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TortugaGrande
- 4 stars Rating: 78
18186 votes total - (29260)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
UKDUDE2 said...
Teague, yes, but his flaws were exposed and was very inconsistent at the start of the year, if he had stayed another year, he could have been a top 10 pick, remember Jeff Teague took a couple years as well. Terrence Jones, he just fell in the draft, and had he left the year prior he would have been a top 5 pick, Doron Lamb was not a 5 star recruit, Eric Bledsoe by most wasn't even in the top 100, Daniel Orton wasn't even a recruit of Calipari's, he just stayed along, and should have stayed like Teague, the dude averaged 2 ppg and was a 1st round draft pick... I'm not going to get into the Memphis players because I don't know as much on their situations. And there goes with the Calipari stuff again... Seriously guys, had Coach K and Duke been convicted on those 2 cases, you wouldn't have these clever little nicknames for him, you'd have little nicknames for Coach K. I know there's definitely some smoke that some see surrounding Calipari, but this is going to happen when you consistently recruit top 5/10 players. Let's be honest, we all don't know if Calipari had knowledge of Camby, and as far as Rose, that's 100% the NCAA's fault for clearing a player to play, then overruling their own previous judgement by saying he should have been ineligible. Which again points to what a previous poster said, the inconsistency of the NCAA.
This post was edited by rockandrollpt2 on 9/27/2012 at 12:33 PM
rockandrollpt2
- 5 stars Rating: 87
388 votes total - (354)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
terpquake said...
DBR, well known poster on turtle soup, was at an bb event today also attended by David Telep. DBR says Telep told him that he sees the Harrison twins as Maryland bound after believing they were going to Ky. earlier this summer. DT said he's "reading the tea leaves".No evidence was sited; but his opinion might cause the optimists amoung us to feel a slight bit more so- or not.
This post was edited by Nocalterp on 10/1/2012 at 12:23 AM
-
Nocalterp said...
Joe Black, on Scout, says he has confirmation that they're going to KY. ''found out today that the official decision is Kentucky...from the Harrison family so Pops can't refute this
yup...Under Armour lost to Nike yet again...wasted time and money on them two''
Guess we'll find out soon....
-
TuckYou ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
3431 votes total - You Mad?
- (3497)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
iheartjamesgist ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
3669 votes total - (2712)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TheBigAlcDog
- 5 stars Rating: 87
1316 votes total - (380)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 11

Harrison Sr. Refutes Report